Adoption History What They Knew

Home
Dr Rickarby's PTSD Research Paper
How the Senate Inquiry was Got
Origins Office Opening
Dian Wellfare Founder of Origns
Origins Web Sites
Forgotten Australians HARP
Australian Adoptee Site
Dyethelstilboestrol (DES)
Rapid Adoption Register
Dr Trish Farrar's Thesis
Critique of the National Apology
SW Sydney Stolen Generations
Senate Inquiry Site
Apologies Site
Wake Up Little Suzie
Civil Rights Crimes
A Father Speaks on Forced Adoption
Rebbecca's Law
Who Are We?
Intercountry Adoption
Origins International
Time Line
History of Adoption (Dian Wellfare)
Dian Wellfare
Smashed by Adoption
Origins Response to AIFS Report
Origins Mental Health Conference Papers
NSW Parliamentary Adoption Inquiry
Sec 39 Queensland
Adoption Crimes and Breaches
Adoption Crimes and Breaches
Mental Health Damage
Stories and Poetry
Life's Journey Project
Fathers Speak Out
Fathers Response to AIFS Report
Dian's Portrait
Forgotten Australians
Rememberance Page
Becoming a Member
Subscription Form
Searching Information
Stolen Generations Alliance
Link-Up
Our Philosphy
Search Guide
Our Products
Senate Inquiry Petition

What they Knew and they still promoted adoption
 
  

SOME ASPECTS OF RESEARCH IN THE FIELD OF ADOPTION

MAEV O'COLLINS..B.A. Dip. Soc. Stud. Social Worker, Catholic Family Welfare Bureau, Melbourne, Vic. (extract from a paper printed in the;  AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF SOCIAL WORK Vol 19, NO 1. February 1966)

 

In assessment and placing of children with adopting applicants we are always looking for their normal capacity for parenthood. Our judgement in many cases is only a little better than chance and our ability to assess possible problems must leave a greater margin for error than perhaps any other field of social welfare. However, it is reassuring to note that studies carried out in the U.S.A. have shown that trained workers in adoption agencies have significantly better results than independent adoption work........Often we are affected by over-crowded nurseries and insufficient couples applying to adopt 'hard to place' children and a growing awareness that delay for the baby can have a damaging effect on his personality that even the best and most understanding couple may not be able to counteract.

 

This may mean that in the 'stress' of the moment we place a child hurriedly, perhaps too soon, perhaps to the wrong couple, perhaps to unsuitable people.

 

Donald Brieland in his experimental study of the Selection of Adoptive Parents at Intake, raised the problem that individual judgement by social workers is only somewhat better than chance.

 

Our task of clarifying and strengthening the reality of parenthood while at the same time not withholding or denying the fact of the childs biological

origins will perhaps always remain the crucial difficulty in adoption.

 

Studies to determine the success or failure in adoption work must always be considered against the background of normal family living, and results may not be readily assessed until 15 or 20 years after the original placement.

 

Adoptive parents will make mistakes because they are human and will not always understand, thus adoption is not a panacea, it will not always produce well adjusted adults but it does seem to be the best plan we have to offer the child denied his own parents'.

 

That timing coincided nicely with legislative changes in Victoria by 1985. The experiment on our children had obviously failed.

 

By 1967, McLelland, referred to the historical developments in the selection of adoptive parents where efforts were also being made to recruit those prepared to take hard to place children:

 

   "including those who were by no means ideal".    

 

McWhinnie scathingly attacked adoption as a hit and miss affair in 1967, publicly exposing (via the Daily Mirror), the findings of research she had conducted on 58 adult adoptees. Of her 58 guinea-pigs, only 15 were well adjusted and considered their childhood to be happy and successful, 10 were poorly adjusted and 21 were still struggling with severe immediate emotional problems relating to adoption. The rest were considered to be intermediate.

 

Adoption Separation as Child Abuse


Enter supporting content here

All Origins Sites are subject to copyright

Origins Inc Supporting People Separated by Adoption
Phone (02) 9725 7723
For direct payment into our bank account you can deposit into
 
ANZ Bank
 
Origins SPSA Inc
BSB No: 012-468
 Account No 4405-15489
 
 
 
Origins SPSA Inc is now a registered charity You can now donate to us from all over the world

Help us fight for justice for people separated by adoption

Or
Become a member of Origins and Support Us  

 
Origins Logo designed by Lina Eve (copywrite)
 
Website designed and maintained by Lily Arthur

Origins SPSA Inc is an unfunded organisation that relies on the memberships and donations of those that support adoption advocacy. It has not been funded by Federal, State or Church to promote adoption awareness and to the support the aims and objectives of Origins. We rely on those that believe in truth and justice for those affected by past practices, we have a large resource library that is considered to be a national asset that has enabled us to make Federal and State governments accountable for past unlawful practices .  To support us make a donation or join us, a link is available at the bottom of this page to make a contribution